Prashant Kale
Page No.: 14603 - 14617
Shagun Malhotra
Page No.: 14618 - 14630
Deewan Singh Rana & Prof. Sunita Godiyal
Page No.: 14631 - 14640
Sneh Lata Yadav
Page No.: 14641 - 14648
Kusum Vijaykumar Chaudhari
Page No.: 14649 - 14652
Ms. Sweety Shivarkar
Page No.: 14653 - 14663
Kusum Vijaykumar Chaudhari
Page No.: 14664 - 14667
Ankita Chaudhary & Monika Mathur
Page No.: 14668 - 14674
Ramesh S. Jagatap
Page No.: 14675 - 14678
Yutheingi
Page No.: 14679 - 14682
Kumar Bigyana Nand Singh
Page No.: 14683 - 14688
Devendra Kumar Yadav
Page No.: 14689 - 14694
E. Sowjanya
Page No.: 14695 - 14702
Raghumani Naik
Page No.: 14703 - 14713
Jeremiah Kawinzi Mulinge, Dr. David Mulwa & Dr. Jacinta Kinyili
Page No.: 14714 - 14724
Miss. Bharti Singh & Minakshi Biswal
Page No.: 14725 - 14729
Konika Kwatra & Rohith P
Page No.: 14730 - 14739
Muniraju M
Page No.: 14740 - 14748
Ritu K. Thakur
Page No.: 14749 - 14754
Vikas Mane
Page No.: 14755 - 14760
Shiva Shukla
Page No.: 14761 - 14771
Jasraj Singh Johal
Page No.: 14772 - 14779
Sudarshana Rana & Nisha Devi
Page No.: 14774 - 14780
Jotsna Mohan Kamble
Page No.: 14781 - 14784
Pornima Ganesh Kadam
Page No.: 14785 - 14788
Mrs. Jaishre Kirankumar Kavathekar
Page No.: 14789 - 14795
Avanish C. Mishra
Page No.: 14796 - 14805
Birpal Singh
Page No.: 14806 - 14813
Mohd Rizwan & Amit Kumar
Page No.: 14814 - 14820
Mrs. Shrutika Watkar & Kunal Jadhav
Page No.: 14821 - 14828
Anil Kumar Tamta
Page No.: 14829 - 14841
Shri. Kaloge Sanjay & Prof. Kailas Khonde
Page No.: 14842 - 14852
Bhagyashree Shrikant Bichukale & Ms. Priya Elias Pais
Page No.: 14853 - 14859
Ekta Jain & Achary Gopal Krushn Thakur
Page No.: 14860 - 14881
Rajarshi Chatterjee
Page No.: 14882 - 14890
Samadhan Kedare & Vaibhav Jadhav
Page No.: 14891 - 14895
Snoj Kumar
Page No.: 14884 - 14889
Sabita Nayak
Page No.: 14890 - 14897
ASMITA NANOTI
Page No.: 14898 - 14903
Abhiranjan Barman
Recived Date: 2021-01-20 | Accepted Date: 2021-02-24 | Published Date: 2021-03-01
Page No.: 14904 - 14909
In all the strata of the society irrespective of Socio-Economic, Political and educational classes, women are facing gender-based discrimination. Gender-Based discrimination is predominant expression of Violence against women. Violence against women has various dimensions. World Health Organization (WHO) states that physical or sexual violence against women are global health problems and human right issue. Sexual harassment of women is a serious problem our society is confronting with. In our society women is used, in maximum cases, as a sexual object of enjoyment. Millions of women irrespective of professional category are found vulnerable to Sexual harassment at the work places. The Constitution of India is pre supposed to foster right to equality, right to life and liberty. Sexual harassment at the work place is the infringement of the Constitutional rights. The Supreme Court of India is the custodian of all the Constitutional rights. The Apex Court of India in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (AIR 1997 SC 301) case for the first time has defied sexual harassment and provided exclusive guidelines in respect of safeguarding women against sexual harassment at the Workplace. This study aims to showcase constitutional rights of women against sexual harassment and promotes the importance of judicial verdicts of Supreme Court and High Courts for protection of women from sexual harassment at workplace.
Sanchita Chakraborty
Recived Date: 2021-01-20 | Accepted Date: 2021-02-24 | Published Date: 2021-03-01
Page No.: 14910 - 14915
Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy of truth, deeply rooted in the concept of Satyagraha, challenges conventional notions of truth as mere factual accuracy or doctrinal certainty. Unlike conventional truth, which often aligns with external validation and subjective interpretation, Satyagraha represents a lived and experiential truth—one that demands moral integrity, self-discipline, and nonviolent resistance. For Gandhi, truth (Satya) was inseparable from nonviolence (Ahimsa) and was both a spiritual pursuit and a practical principle for social and political transformation. This article explores the distinction between Satyagraha and conventional truth, emphasizing how Gandhi’s commitment to truth was not static but dynamic, evolving through introspection, dialogue, and action. His philosophy underscores the ethical imperative of truth-seeking as a means of self-purification and social justice, rejecting coercion and embracing the transformative power of nonviolent resistance. By contrasting Satyagraha with conventional understandings of truth, this article highlights Gandhi’s unique approach to ethical and political engagement, demonstrating its enduring relevance in contemporary struggles for justice and human rights.
Aloke Ray
Recived Date: 2021-01-20 | Accepted Date: 2021-02-24 | Published Date: 2021-03-01
Page No.: 14916 - 14923
Caste-based discrimination and social inequality arising from surnames have long existed in Indian society. The story of Ekalavya in the Mahabharata illustrates how a talented individual was marginalized due to his caste identity. In society, a surname is not just a means of identification but also a tool to sustain social hierarchy. While the Bhagavad Gita describes the caste system as based on qualities and actions, it later became birth-based, hindering social progress. The consolidation of power and political interests further strengthened this system. To eliminate such discrimination, it is essential to reduce surname-based identity and emphasize work-based recognition, fostering true social equality.
Dr. Manjeet Singh Bhandari
Recived Date: 2021-01-20 | Accepted Date: 2021-02-24 | Published Date: 2021-03-01
Page No.: 14924 - 14926